What Is The One Makeup Brand You Will Never Support Forum

Impactful Ninja is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more Learn more .

Chapter Disclosure

Hey fellow impactful ninja ?

You may have noticed that Impactful Ninja is all about providing helpful information to brand a positive impact on the world and society. And that we love to link dorsum to where we found all the information for each of our posts.

Most of these links are informational-based for you lot to check out their primary sources with i click.
Just some of these links are then-called "affiliate links" to products that we recommend.

Why do nosotros add these product links?

First and foremost, because we believe that they add value to y'all. For example, when we wrote a post about the ecology impact of long showers, we came across an EPA recommendation to utilize WaterSense showerheads. And then we linked to where you tin find them. Or, for many of our posts, nosotros too link to our favorite books on that topic so that you can get a much more holistic overview than one unmarried weblog post could provide.

And when in that location is an affiliate programme for these products, nosotros sign upward for it. For case, as Amazon Assembly, we earn from qualifying purchases.

What do these affiliate links mean for yous?

First, and most importantly, we nonetheless simply recommend products that we believe add value for yous.
When you buy something through i of our chapter links, we may earn a modest commission - only at no additional costs to you.
And when you buy something through a link that is non an chapter link, we won't receive any commission but we'll still exist happy to have helped you.

What do these affiliate links hateful for us?

When we find products that we believe add together value to y'all and the seller has an chapter program, we sign up for it.
When you purchase something through i of our affiliate links, we may earn a small commission (at no actress costs to you).
And at this point in fourth dimension, all money is reinvested in sharing the most helpful content with you. This includes all operating costs for running this site and the content cosmos itself.

What does this mean for me personally?

You lot may have noticed past the way Impactful Ninja is operated that money is not the driving factor backside it. It is a passion project of mine and I dear to share helpful information with you to make a positive bear upon on the world and society. However, it's a project in that I invest a lot of fourth dimension and as well quite some money.

Eventually, my dream is to one 24-hour interval turn this passion projection into my full-fourth dimension job and provide even more helpful information. Merely that's still a long time to go.

Stay impactful,

Dazzler brands worldwide have had several controversies surrounding the industry over the final few years, with most drama occurring on social media. And many makeup companies' blunders inspired some very entertaining headlines. But when all the fume and chat room-dust had settled, we had several brands left continuing in the unethical spotlight.

The nigh unethical makeup companies include brands that still test on animals like Nars, Clinique, Victoria's Secret, Maybelline, Do good, Chanel, and more than. Other makeup companies have unethical working weather condition and practice private labeling, selling other brands' products every bit originals.

We run into a growing number of one time-respected brands sell out on their commitments to ethical practices that kept us loyal for decades. We have besides embraced several companies alongside our influencers on social media but to detect that we were duped into a scheme that sold poor-quality makeup at luxury prices. Nosotros're pledging to exist more savvy consumers and it starts by fugitive these unethical brands.

Related: Your actions and choices dramatically affect the world effectually you. But did you know that there are elementary, reliable techniques you tin apply to live more ethically in a style that is not only good for you simply besides for society at large? Check out the book Do The Right Thing: Living Ethically in an Unethical World (link to Amazon) to run into how you tin can easily employ these in your daily life.

26 Makeup Companies Even so Conducting Animal Testing

According to PETA, the following popular makeup brands are still testing on animals, many of which were called out directly on PETA's website. Many of these brands are considered cruelty-free; however, as you will encounter, this is non e'er the case. With all these brands, the issue is in the fine impress, wherein a brand can legally claim to be cruelty-free "except when required past law."

And if the brand is sold in China–where animal testing is required by police–then this means the brand is non actually cruelty-free. If you are curious about any particular make, yous tin can usually notice this information provided on their website.

O.P.I.

O.P.I. was once on PETA's Dazzler Without Bunnies list. Withal, the make (owned by Coty, Inc.) was removed from the list when PETA discovered the company had abandoned its anti-animal testing policy and sold products in the Chinese market. At present it is just ane of many brands that have sold out its ethics and ethical principles for the chance to make money in Mainland china.

NARS

NARS once served many as the staple brand for cruelty-gratis makeup. Unfortunately, in early 2020, the make updated its animal testing policy, equally information technology recently joined into the Chinese marketplace. What does that exactly mean? Unfortunately this means that NARS at present conducts animal tests where required by law. They are no longer a cruelty-free brand.

L'Oreal

L'Oreal is no exception to the legal loophole that allows them to claim that they no longer test on animals. And while the company has made peachy progress in its commitment to eliminate animal testing, PETA still lists it as a "do exam" brand. Like PETA, we promise to meet L'Oreal commit to leaving the Chinese market place so that information technology tin can be fully free from fauna cruelty.

Maybelline & Lancôme

Maybelline is a popular drugstore brand that many adore, and Lancôme has been the staple mascara provider for many over the years. Only both companies share their policies with their parent company, L'Oreal. So long as the brands are sold in Communist china, where foreign cosmetics must undergo mandatory animal testing, Maybelline and Lancôme cannot be considered cruelty-free brands.

Benefit

Do good has been hailed past many as cruelty-free, but this is not true. The make'southward policy is non to test unless required by law, and it sells its products in mainland Mainland china. Do good currently sells out of Sephora in China with no indication of leaving any fourth dimension before long.

Victoria's Hole-and-corner

Victoria's Secret spent years upholding a policy that said the brand would never test on animals. Never say never, every bit it were, because the company ultimately chose profits over its principles, letting down many consumers when the make expanded into China.

Plainly, the company that was once vowed confronting animate being cruelty was only against information technology until the price was right. Victoria Hush-hush now joins the others on this list to pay for the cruel and mortiferous testing required in commutation for the grand amounts of money companies stand to brand off the large Chinese population.

Revlon, Almay, and Elizabeth Arden

Revlon is the parent visitor of both Almay and Elizabeth Arden, and all brands share Revlon's policy that states animal testing is done "where required by police." Almay may seem to be cruelty-complimentary with its "clean" and "effortless" attitude, but it still is sold in Communist china and is still subjected to required animal testing.

Elizabeth Arden even claims to be committed to eliminating creature testing; however, as long equally the brands are sold in People's republic of china, they will testify themselves to be more than committed to money.

Rimmel London

Rimmel London carries the claim that it is confronting fauna testing, only the make, similar so many others, is sold in China. When asked well-nigh this, the company turned the blame onto Chinese consumers, stating the people want Rimmel London products and that it wouldn't be right to deprive them of what they want. The company shares its policy with its parent visitor Coty, Inc.

Chanel

Chanel is not considered a cruelty-free brand. Every bit is common with most of these companies, Chanel's policy on beast testing is unavailable on the brand's website. But we know its products are sold in Prc, and we know that they must exam on animals in order to practice so.

Estée Lauder & Its Subsidiaries

Estée Lauder claims to be committed to eliminating animal testing, but non committed enough to terminate selling in the Chinese market. It is also the parent company of several popular subsidiaries which are also on PETA'southward listing, including:

Clinique
Bobbi Brown
La Mer
GLAMGLOW
Origins

These companies are all subject to the same animal-testing policy with the clause that requires it in Red china, keeping them all from being cruelty-free.

In add-on, Estée Lauder has managed to upset many of its customers over the 2020 holiday, every bit many people placed orders but never had them fulfilled. The company took its time in responding to angry customers nearly the issue, but to offer a generic, insincere sounding, corporate response. Worse yet, many customers still have non received their product or a refund.

M.A.C. Cosmetics

M.A.C. is besides owned by Estée Lauder, though many are unaware of the connection. We call the brand out separately from its sister companies above considering information technology is easily one of the most well-known and most popular makeup brands ever. And for a long time, M.A.C. was a cruelty-free brand.

However, existence a subsidiary of Estée Lauder, Chiliad.A.C. is besides subjected to the animal testing policy since its products are sold in China.

Mary Kay

Mary Kay representatives are oftentimes unknowing peddlers of misinformation when it comes to the make's policy on animal testing. They all echo the brand's claim well-nigh non testing on animals, but Mary Kay has the same "where required by police force" rule as all the rest listed hither.

In 1989, the company announced the halt of all animal testing on its products. Unfortunately, in 2012, Mary Kay decided to start selling its products in China, and they began testing on animals once again and continues to do and so today.

Avon

Avon is another brand that benefits from misleading their representatives, who then fool the customers unwittingly for them. The company holds claim as the first major makeup company to end animal testing on its products back in the '90s, as they accept "a deep respect for fauna welfare."

Merely it was discovered that Avon authorizes and pays local Chinese officials to behave animal testing for them. This way, the make can withal sell its products in China without bothering it with that pesky legality clause like all these other brands on this list. Although, it would seem like its "deep respect" merits is just a advisedly worded distraction from the fact that Avon is not a cruelty-free make.

Bourjois

Bourjois is a trendy French makeup brand previously owned by Chanel, which was likely involved with creature testing. Coty Inc. acquired the make in 2015, but we know that this was a mere sidestep every bit far every bit upstanding practices are concerned. Bourjois products are tested on animals, and the brand is not considered cruelty-free.

Make Upwardly for Ever

Make Upwards For Ever is a theatrical-quality brand beloved by makeup artists for its bright, long-lasting appearance. Owned past LVMH (Louis Vuitton/Moët Hennessy), Make Up For Ever is sold at Sephora, and, yes, information technology is as well sold in China. For this reason, this make was also called out by PETA for animal testing.

Dior & Guerlain

Dior and Guerlain are both LVMH owned likewise, and, like all luxury brands that sell in mainland Prc, they examination on animals. Guerlain says they "are strongly opposed to animal testing and take developed recognized expertise in alternatives to animal testing." But this just sounds similar some other clever way of saying someone else does testing on the make'south behalf.

Burberry

Burberry has managed to convince some that they are more upstanding than they are, leading to some misbelief that the visitor remains cruelty-free. This is due, in function, to its PETA campaign, and while the company has fabricated some improvements, it still has a long fashion to become. Unfortunately, Burberry is still testing on animals since its products are sold in China.

four Makeup Companies That Don't Seem To Care Near Y'all

Z Palette

You may remember the hype in 2017 on social media surrounding something called the Z Potter. This is a special device created by Z Palette that, at the time, the company called "game-changing."

The device'southward purpose was to salvage y'all fourth dimension, makeup, and money by removing makeup from its original packaging. The oestrus helps to release the makeup from its packaging, substantially melting lipsticks and concealers, which you can and so apply to create your own palettes. This was an exciting prospect for many, who ultimately chose to buy into the idea and purchase the device, which came with a pretty hefty $85 toll tag.

However, many were taken ashamed when they received their order to discover that they essentially had purchased cypher more than a hotplate. Many injure customers voiced their negative feedback on Z Palette'southward social media accounts, questioning both the cost and practicality. Just the replies from the brand'south Public Relations personnel in charge of social media shocked and insulted customers.

Z Palette'southward social media responses to several client critiques were considered past many every bit bullying from the company. Many responses called customers names, while some clearly expressed the make was uninterested in retaining customers that they didn't deem worthy. Z Palette also insulted its customers' intelligence, mocking that there was a difference betwixt hotplates and consecration, even so offered no education on the matter.

The company comments were so bad that some speculated they had been hacked and someone was trying to make them look bad. Alas, they had not been hacked.

At the time, many boycotted the company; afterward, many retailers dropped the brand. Now, years afterwards, Z Palette has dropped the price on its Z Potter to $59. All the same, in that location has been no attempt to "re-make" or absolve for the ugliness of its by, which leaves many nevertheless bitter and boycotting the bullies they have established themselves to be.

Morphe

While many customers rave about this make and its low prices, Morphe has a difficult time convincing others that they care near anything other than manipulating them out of their money. Information technology took some time for those who follow beauty influencers and makeup brands on social media to figure it out because they seem to be a good visitor that's all well-nigh working with influencers. Though, that ought to accept been the first clue.

With all the drama surrounding the brand, customers have started accusing Morphe of not caring almost quality, which no longer lives upward to the hype, claiming the brand is just focused on exploiting influencers to brand money, abusing the trust and loyalty that influencers take with their followers.

But perchance the brand'southward biggest scandal was in 2020 when the Jaclyn Hill original palette formula was changed without warning. The change had caused the pallets to no longer exist vegan–a feature that was very important to many of its customers. When originally confronted, the company lied about the change it had attempted to keep hidden.

One time the public called it out, Jaclyn apologized, claiming she was unaware of such details. The company as well admitted it withheld such information from her. Of course, this is more proof for many customers that the brand simply exploits influencers to pawn its inexpensive makeup off on their followers.

Another controversy surrounding the make for years now is that Crowne and Morphe are the aforementioned visitor. The BeautyGuruChatter community on Reddit believed Morphe to be a private labeling company. If truthful, this means the make does not make its own products; rather, information technology purchases products from other companies and places its ain proper name and logo on them. And if that's the case, then Morphe'south claims that it develops its own formulas are bogus.

And that means you could be ownership the same stuff with a Crowne label at a lower price.

ColourPop

ColourPop is a brand that is more often than not well-loved by its customers for keen products and affordable prices. Merely a few stumbles with some launches accept had customers scratching their heads.

One such stumble was a few years ago at the release of its contour Sculpting Stix. Names like "Typo" and "Yikes" were used to proper name darker shades, which some felt was disrespectful to the company's customers of color. The company was quick to apologize and change the names, but the harm had been done for many. ColourPop has been very selective about how it names its shades ever since.

The make also was defendant of selling contaminated lipsticks in reviews that surfaced subsequently several customers had issues with their products from the Disney drove. Claims of hair, white fuzz, and blackness dots on the outside of the products were reported. Accusations of poor-quality products go along to fill up review boards online.

Just the thing everyone is talking near these days is the speculation that ColourPop is reselling its products repackaged as Kylie Cosmetics. Both companies originally denied this to be true, yet many remained skeptical.

It was subsequently discovered the two brands merged under a parent company of their ain creation, Seed Beauty, to better control all aspects of their business organization. It's not a horrible business decision by any stretch, but this doesn't sit down well for many consumers, as many feel the association was a downgrade for the company. And it certainly didn't squelch the theory that they repackage their products.

Kylie Cosmetics

Kylie, Kylie, Kylie. She certainly has had her fair share of bug with her beauty launches. And she has been defendant of most every unethical and poor business concern practise there is, leading many to the conclusion that her makeup brand is worth less than the hype information technology rode in on.

First, the brand was called out for its terrible lipstick applicators. Kylie addressed this outcome. But then the accusation surfaced that her lipsticks were just ColourPop's quondam products repackaged. And we already know how that turned out.

The brand was likewise called out for overpriced and late shipping, and Kylie was even sued for intellectual belongings theft.

Then there was the scandal, which did not pass the aroma examination for many of Kylie's customers. Her Royal Peach Palette had several lament the smell gave them headaches, with at least 15 customers filing complaints with the Improve Business Bureau proverb they smelled chemicals and gum when they opened the container.

Overall, many feel that the buzz behind the brand was hyped to inflate the company's perceived value past its customers–an exaggeration that is required in the entertainment business concern and pays off in spades. And many have noticed Kylie's sudden absence from the makeup scene, accusing her of not caring now that her company isn't in the ideal lime-low-cal she prefers.

And to the dismay of many, the brand is not completely vegan, adding insult to the many, many injuries. (Though the brand does have some vegan products.) It is also non Leaping Bunny certified. However, to its credit, the make is considered cruelty free. But it should exist noted that Kylie Cosmetics is 51% endemic by Coty Inc., which does participate in animal testing in some places (mostly in China).

Last just certainly non to the lowest degree, reports accept surfaced that call out unethical working conditions in the brand's laboratories. Information technology is said that employees take non been provided sufficient protective equipment and brand minimum wage without benefits. Some workers have also claimed to get headaches from chemical smells.

The Mica Issue in the Makeup Industry

If you lot haven't all the same heard near the mica controversy, it'southward time you did. This information has been spreading effectually the earth for years now, with many in America merely at present becoming aware of the issue. And unfortunately, the news is grim, as there is virtually no escaping unethical dazzler.

Believed to have etymological influence from the Latin micare, meaning to flash, shine, or glitter, mica refers to a drove of several crystalline minerals. Mica is used every bit an ingredient for dozens of industries to add together shimmer to annihilation from paint to toothpaste to lotion and, yes, cosmetics. In fact, you'd be difficult-pressed to find a piece of makeup you own that doesn't take mica in it.

Refinery29 helped expose mica'due south issue in an investigative documentary and an accompanying article chosen Mica: The Makeup Industry's Darkest Secret. We suggest you take half an 60 minutes to check out. It does a nice job of compacting an overview of this incredibly circuitous topic that has exposed the globe to yet another example of child labor.

India has a large monopoly on the mica mining industry, bookkeeping for roughly threescore% of the earth's mica, with 25% coming from regions where child labor is prevalent. And those who live in these villages that are abundant with this resource ofttimes observe themselves at the mercy of its demand. Abuse has infiltrated the industry throughout the supply concatenation, and many families are forced to put their children to work because they are and then dependent upon the income.

Unfortunately, it has been discovered that there is admittedly no transparency in many of these mines, so there is no style of knowing if the mica used in your makeup was sourced with kid labor or not.

Some makeup brands have embraced synthetic mica every bit an upstanding alternative to this association with child labor. And while this is a great choice, the complexity of the consequence wherein so many of these families rely on the manufacture to survive, the answer is not in boycotting the natural ingredient altogether.

While you tin can cull to address this affair however you encounter fit, nosotros suggest that you help put the pressure level on makeup companies to do their function by supporting brands that are actively involved in taking action and avoiding brands that aren't. Many brands accept come together to form the Responsible Mica Initiative (R.Thou.I.), which is committed to eliminating kid labor from the Mica supply concatenation in u.s. of Bihar and Jharkhand in India by 2022.

But it should be noted that the sourcing of natural ingredients for cosmetics has environmental, social, and governance risks (referred to equally E.Southward.G. risks), which range across the unabridged supply chain and threatens the reputation of the beauty industry as a whole. Indeed, unsustainable and unethical practices are so securely instilled inside the industry, and the problem is worse than many originally thought it to be.

Avert Brands Using Unethical Advertising

Studies in neuroscience accept revealed that a mere v% of cognitive activities, including emotions, actions, and decisions, are conscious. The other 95% are not-conscious. This tin explain why and so many of us tend to gravitate "naturally" toward more eco-friendly and ethical brands.

But research also shows that consumers are driven by emotions when it comes to dazzler products.

It was too determined that consumers become higher satisfaction and greater validation in brands that strengthen and feed the perception that using a product is "caring for oneself." And oftentimes, companies are promoting themselves as "natural" or "organic" or "rubber" (even when they aren't) to play into your unconscious decisions to buy dark-green.

And unfortunately, the F.D.A. doesn't fifty-fifty regulate most of these claims in cosmetics products, and companies can get away with making these claims.

But what'south worse is many brands have resorted to literal fear-mongering in some of their advertisements to convince you they are the superior make. Such tactics are highly unethical, and you should be cautious to avoid falling for them. Oftentimes, anyone trying to focus on something or someone else is usually trying to hide their ain crimes, failures, or shortcomings.

Concluding Thoughts

Unfortunately, unethical practices have become somewhat commonplace for makeup companies. Indeed, the entire dazzler industry is inadvertently associated with child labor due to its use of mica. And fast-makeup brands have proven to be just as unsustainable as fast-fashion brands. Many companies are trying hard to avert these upstanding pitfalls, merely we consumers must do our due diligence to ensure we support brands that are genuine in such efforts.